![history wars the enola gay chapter 2 summary history wars the enola gay chapter 2 summary](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/38396160/mini_magick20190225-24358-vtus7k.png)
![history wars the enola gay chapter 2 summary history wars the enola gay chapter 2 summary](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/318851938_The_Atomic_Bombing_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki_Through_the_Eyes_of_Prof_Bunsaku_Arakatsu/links/5c15407fa6fdcc494ff7ba14/largepreview.png)
The Soviet issue (whether dropping the bomb was done solely to impress Moscow for political and military gains) and the Japanese one (whether Tokyo would have surrendered solely because of a threat to drop the bomb) have become major points of contention between conservative and revisionist historians. In analyzing the decision to bomb, Maddox considers several major points, including the Soviet and Japanese dimensions and the casualty question. Maddox begins his investigation by reviewing the dilemmas president Harry Truman faced as he took over from Franklin D. motives for bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. political scholarship influenced by the Vietnam war, which heavily criticized U.S.
![history wars the enola gay chapter 2 summary history wars the enola gay chapter 2 summary](https://th-thumbnailer.cdn-si-edu.com/YEYeRB2O1nHrfzYv54hMsrc_vo4=/fit-in/1600x0/https://tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com/filer/a8/ef/a8ef861e-78e2-4eb7-a5d4-4e904f4bc725/nasm-si-2004-57996-028b.jpg)
Maddox argues, with reason, that Alperovitz epitomizes the extreme revisionism that characterized 1960s U.S. Over nine chapters, Maddox takes the reader along the complex and sometimes confusing path of political and military decision-making in an attempt to dispel what he terms "the fondness of many academics for tales of conspiracy in high places." The "many" academics seem to have a single leader: Gar Alperovitz, the author of Atomic Diplomacy (1965 rev. This also becomes clear in historiographical terms in Robert James Maddox's review of the events leading to the decision to drop the bomb. postage stamp showing an atomic cloud, opinions ran deep. From the congressional rancor over the canceled Enola Gay exhibit to Japanese disgust with the U.S. The controversies of summer 1995 surrounding the fiftieth anniversary of the atomic bombings of Japan left all sides agreed on only one point: little, if anything, was historically resolved. Weapons for Victory: The Hiroshima Decision Fifty Years Later.Ĭolumbia: University of Missouri Press, 1995.